The stock response
The stock response is a single rehearsed sentence for receiving criticism: “Thank you for the feedback, I’m really working on that and I appreciate your support and any pointers you can give me.” You say it whether or not you agree, and especially when you are angry. It is not capitulation; it is a holding position. Feedback lands hard on this brain, and the stock response gets you through the meeting unscathed — the judgement about what the feedback was actually worth is made later, once the heat has gone out of it.
The problem as you experience it
Criticism does not land on this brain the way it lands on others. A mild note in a board pack review — “this section feels thin” — arrives with the force of a verdict on your competence, your judgement and, within about four seconds, your career. You know the reaction is disproportionate even as it is happening. Knowing does not stop it.
The danger is not the feeling; it is what the feeling does in the room. The flushed defence of a detail nobody was attacking. The too-sharp reply to a colleague who was, on any fair reading, trying to help. At senior level these moments are remembered longer than the work is, and you cannot argue your way out of them afterwards.
The practice
You need one sentence, rehearsed until it requires no thought at all, deployed every single time feedback arrives:
“Thank you for the feedback, I’m really working on that and I appreciate your support and any pointers you can give me.”
Say it when the feedback is fair. Say it when it is lazy, wrong or political. Say it — especially — when you are angry, because the sentence is doing its real work precisely then: it occupies the seconds in which the damaging reply would have been made, and it gives the room nothing to remember. You leave the meeting unscathed, which was the entire objective.
The judgement about the feedback itself is made later, deliberately, at least a day on, when the heat has gone out of it. Some of it will turn out to be gold; most will be noise; a little will be politics. All three categories get the same sentence in the room. This is not weakness or insincerity — it is recognising that the moment of receipt is the single worst-equipped moment this brain will ever have for evaluating what it has just heard, and declining to make decisions in it.